Managed IT Services in Isle of Palms, SC

COLUMBIA —The first day of testimony in the trial involving a retaining wall constructed on the Isle of Palms showcased the staunch determination with which Rom Reddy is prepared to fight the state's environmental agency to protect what he argues are his property rights.

The May 6 hearing before Administrative Law Chief Justice Ralph Anderson revealed a battle that started as a property owner seeking protections against rising tides, but has quickly turned into a self-described battle against the "police powers of the state," as Reddy said in his opening statement.

Wearing a black suit with a red tie, Reddy represented himself against the state Department of Environmental Services' counsel after firing his team of lawyers a week before the hearings were to begin. During the first day of the trial, he often took aim at the agency by referring to its representatives as "unelected bureaucrats."

"This is a hoax," Reddy said to a small courtroom in the Edgar A. Brown Building on Pendleton Street in Columbia.

Sallie Phelan, an attorney for DES, argued that the homeowners continued work on the structure, made mostly of concrete and reinforced with metal brackets, despite three cease-and-desist directives sent by the agency.

"We're here today about a total disregard of the law and a total disregard of the department's authority to regulate the coast and the beaches critical area," Phelan said.

DES attorneys are asking Anderson to uphold the validity of the penalties levied against the couple last July, reaffirm their jurisdiction over South Carolina beaches, and order the removal of the wall.

Reddy and his wife Renee, who appeared next to him in court, are defending the 150-foot wall they constructed between their home on Ocean Boulevard and the ocean in 2023.

Witness describes erosion, damaged wall

The hearings will include testimony over three days from a slate of witnesses, including current and former DES employees, a coastal engineering expert and an Isle of Palms resident.

Matt Slagel, a former beachfront management section manager for DES who responsible for reviewing applications within the state's beachfront jurisdiction was the first witness called to the stand.

In his testimony, he described a tenuous line of communication with the Reddys. The couple requested an emergency permit for sand scraping to repair dunes eroded in May 2023. Slagel said he denied the request, but told the Reddys they could stabilize the eroded area with sand fencing or vegetation.

Later, the agency learned of plans to place clay in the critical area of the beach. Slagel said he met with the Reddys and their contractor in June 2023 to discuss other ways to stabilize the area that avoided placing non-compatible materials in the beach.

At that time, Slagel said the clay had already been buried, which the agency did not learn until the discovery process for the trial began.

He testified that he didn't realize that a retaining wall was buried under the sand until December 2023. The wall was exposed following an unexpected nor'easter that month.

Photos presented in court showed the exposed wall reinforced with wood and metal brackets, and cracks filled with yellow foam.

"Following the nor'easter, (the wall) had started to tilt towards the beach. It was becoming undermined. It was starting to break apart at the seams," Slagel said.

Dark, wet sand in front of the wall meant it had been exposed to waves and water, Slagel said.

He said this meant the wall was situated in a critical area of the beach where wave action prevents plants from growing, or periodic inundation. Building and construction in this area is limited and often requires a permit from DES.

Reddy argued that the agency used deficient data to justify what is considered "periodic," referring to a storm damage survey Slagel conducted in December 2023 to document erosion from the nor'easter.

Reddy to attempt 'takings' claim

Reddy and counsel for DES spent much of the the first day of hearings questioning Slagel. Around 5:30 p.m., Jacques Prevost, a compliance manager for the agency who attended site visits and conducted inspections at the Reddys' property since 2023, was called to testify.

Reddy is also arguing that the agency's actions—penalizing the homeowners $289,000 and attempting to stop the construction of the wall—amounts to a taking of private property.

He referenced David Lucas, an Isle of Palms property owner, who in the 1990s, challenged the state's beachfront management laws.

Lucas purchased two properties on the island in 1986 with plans to build homes on the lots. The South Carolina Beachfront Management Act was enacted two years later and the state's Coastal Council, a predecessor to DES, told him he was not allowed to build.

He was successful in his challenge that ultimately reached the Supreme Court in 1992. Lucas has since become a vocal supporter of the Reddys in this case.

However, the takings claim is not one that can be tried in the state's administrative law court, Judge Anderson told Reddy when the hearing began. The ALC hears cases that are statutory in nature, and can review and enforce administrative orders issued by regulatory agencies.

Day two of hearings will begin at 10 a.m. on May 7 and are expected to conclude on May 8.

Editor's note: This story has been updated to reflect the correct spelling of names for DES counsel and witnesses.

Reach Anna Sharpe at 843-806-6790.

A judge has ruled against two Isle of Palms property owners who challenged the state’s authority to stop construction of seawalls that worsen erosion of the public beach.

In an unexpectedly strong opinion that supports the state’s 37-year-old beach protection law, Judge Ralph King Anderson III said South Carolina has authority over all areas of the sandy beach, despite arguments by the property owners that it does not.

The preliminary ruling is not the final word on the issue, but it gives an idea of how he interprets the coastal law as his court prepares to hear the property owners’ full legal challenge over seawall construction next week.

Landowners Rom and Renee Reddy, who live on the beach at the lower end of the Isle of Palms, have challenged a $289,000 state fine over construction of a seawall they built along the shore in 2023.

The Reddys contend that it was their right to build the structure, which protected their home from the ocean, because the part of the beach where the wall was constructed is not within state jurisdiction. They also claim the state’s action against them amounts to taking their private property.

But Anderson’s ruling said the state has jurisdiction over that part of the beach, noting that the Department of Environmental Services “had the authority to impose the administrative order against’’ the Reddys. His ruling denied the Reddy’s request to overturn the fine before the full trial was held.

Leslie Lenhardt, a lawyer involved in the case on behalf of environmentalists, cheered Anderson’s April 24 ruling.

“It’s an extremely positive ruling in that Judge Anderson made a legal conclusion that DES has jurisdiction,’’ she said. “That’s a real affirmation – and that’s great news.’’

The Reddy’s trial is scheduled to start Tuesday, May 6 at the Administrative Law Court in Columbia. Lenhardt pointed out that the case still must go to trial and the outcome of the DES enforcement case is not settled.

Rom Reddy, a wealthy owner of small newspapers and outspoken supporter of President Donald Trump, said he doesn’t think he’ll win his case when the trial is concluded in the administrative law court. But Reddy said he’s prepared to appeal any unfavorable decision to the state Supreme Court. He said he is planning a federal lawsuit and expects his legal case will eventually be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Reddys have the support of David Lucas, a coastal property owner who won a similar legal case more than 30 years ago.

“This is not justice but tyranny,’’ Reddy said in a text to The State newspaper. “Ultimately, this is a question of whether a government can confiscate a citizen’s land in the name of environmental protection with no compensation.’’

Reddy expressed his displeasure with the administrative law court system, in which judges rule on disputed environmental cases. He said he deserves a jury trial, not “a trial by a judge who is part of the unelected agency state that accused and convicted me of wrongdoing with no due process.’’

Anderson has a reputation as a judge sympathetic to property rights who often rules against conservation and citizens’ groups seeking to stop state approval of environmental permits. That’s why the strong wording in his decision surprised conservationists and others who are following the case.

Department of Environmental Services officials have said little publicly about the case, but maintain in court documents their actions were legal under South Carolina law.

Reddy is so upset about the state’s dealings with him that he started a political action committee that favors cutting regulations and slashing the government workforce, as the Trump administration is doing at the federal level. He also has spoken against the confirmation of Myra Reece, the DES interim director whose agency fined him $289,000.

According to court documents, the Reddys hired a contractor about two years ago to fill in 1,255 square feet of beach and build a hard erosion control structure, a government term referring to a seawall or bulkhead.

The structure was built after state officials learned of the Reddys’ plans and warned them not to move forward, a state enforcement document shows.

New seawalls on jurisdictional areas of the beach have been illegal since 1988. Reddy told South Carolina regulators he was trying to repair his yard from damage that occurred from a lack of protective dunes near the ocean.

The issue, which has sparked debate in the state Legislature, centers on sections of the seashore that fall outside of building restriction lines established decades ago to keep construction back from the oceanfront.

Enacted through a landmark 1988 law, the lines are intended to make sure new buildings and seawalls are not constructed so close to the ocean that they are hit by waves that worsen erosion of the public beach and damage seaside properties.

Now, parts of the state’s beaches have shifted inland of the building restriction lines, exposing sandy areas of seashore. The Reddys and their supporters say the state doesn’t have authority in the areas outside the restrictive lines. They note that the Legislature has made changes to the law in recent years.

The state’s argument boils down to this: Regardless of the location of the building restriction lines – known as setbacks and baselines – any area that becomes part of the sandy beach falls within state oversight as a result of South Carolina’s 1988 law.

Anderson’s ruling backed that argument. He said beaches include all seaside lands where the ocean regularly washes. Those are sandy areas where most vegetation cannot survive because salt water is toxic to many plants.

Anderson wrote that DES “undeniably has jurisdiction ... even if such lands fall landward of the setback line.’’

Lenhardt said the ruling is encouraging because Reddy’s legal case threatened the state’s long-standing beach protection law. The law allows for state jurisdiction of all sandy beach areas, not just those on the oceanside of building restriction lines, she said.

That’s important because beaches are eroding as sea level rise continues. The emergence of sandy beach areas landward of the building restriction lines demonstrates that shorelines are subject to change and property owners need to be aware of that, she said.

“With all this erosion from climate change and sea level rise, there is more and more often critical area (in state jurisdiction) landward of the setback line,’’ Lenhardt said.

This story was originally published April 29, 2025 at 8:20 AM.

Politics & Government

April 28, 2025 9:52 AM

Politics & Government

April 21, 2025 10:01 PM

See all stories

The State

803-771-8537

Sammy Fretwell has covered the environment beat for The State since 1995. He writes about an array of issues, including wildlife, climate change, energy, state environmental policy, nuclear waste and coastal development. He has won numerous awards, including Journalist of the Year by the S.C. Press Association in 2017. Fretwell is a University of South Carolina graduate who grew up in Anderson County. Reach him at 803 771 8537. Support my work with a digital subscription

Isle of Palms looks to reinstate a seasonal parking pass following a rise in prices for off-island residents. April 11, 2025. (WCIV)

ISLE OF PALMS, S.C. (WCIV) — A change in parking prices on Isle of Palms has upset many locals.

Now, city leaders are considering bringing back a popular seasonal pass that was cut earlier this year.

“Isle of Palms is definitely the beach that I prefer,” said Dillon Clyburn with his family.

But going to the beach is getting more expensive for them.

READ MORE | "Isle of Palms approves parking fee hike, expects $400K in additional revenue."

Ahead of this beach season, Isle of Palms (IOP) got rid of its $60 summer parking pass for non-island residents.

“It just seems like they don't want the locals, the people that live in Mount Pleasant, Sullivans Island. surrounding Charleston areas to want to make it affordable for them to come over to their area and support their local businesses,” Clyburn, a Mount Pleasant resident, said.

Locals now have the option of buying a weekly pass for $100.

In January, IOP City Council raised parking rates for the first time in five years.

“The island is crowded during the summer months. It's very crowded. But we have to maintain the quality of our residential area on the island,” said Rusty Streetman, a city council member.

READ MORE | "Isle of Palms' new parking enforcement plan issues over 3K tickets in 4 months."

Still, Clyburn and other locals say these changes, on top of higher parking ticket fees, make them feel like the city is prioritizing tourists over neighbors.

“It's kind of pushing the residents of Charleston County and the greater Lowcountry out and making it more for the people that are coming in from out of state,” Clyburn explained.

Daily rates at the city’s parking lots also jumped to $15 during the week and $25 on the weekends.

Streetman said IOP leaders are now discussing bringing back a version of the seasonal passes.

“We think that we can take a few hundred, at least a few hundred parking passes, make that available for off-island residents who would like to purchase those,” he said.

Streetman hopes roughly 500 passes can be made but said they will be significantly more expensive than the old $60 option.

A reboot of the seasonal passes will go before the city council in May.

If you click on links we provide, we may receive compensation.

We asked our readers to vote for their favorite spots for fresh catch and local shrimp in the Palmetto State—here are their picks.

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. When in South Carolina, find the nearest seafood dive and tuck into a platter of fried shrimp—preferably one served with an ice-cold beer and an unobstructed view of the water. While you can take to Google or a guidebook to determine where to go for steamed oysters or shrimp and grits in the Lowcountry, we decided to consult the folks who care about good Southern seafood as much as we do: our readers. Here are the 10 best seafood spots in South Carolina, as voted by Southern Living readers.

Lee's Inlet Kitchen

When you’ve been around for more than 75 years, you’re bound to be doing something right. At this beloved institution in the fishing village of Murrells Inlet, try not to load up on the hot hush puppies they bring to the table on arrival—though it's awfully tempting. There's still so much more to savor, like the hand-peeled, cold-boiled shrimp pulled from the waters of nearby McClellanville or the thin and crispy onion rings—Lee’s is as famous for those as it is for the seafood.

Order: The Shrimp Salad ($28.95), made with boiled fantail shrimp and Duke's mayo, is another house specialty.

4460 US-17 Business, Murrells Inlet, SC 29576; leesinletkitchen.com

explore Murrells Inlet

Hudson’s Seafood House on the Docks

It doesn’t get much fresher than this Hilton Head Island mainstay, where 90% of the seafood served comes directly from the surrounding waters. Because of its enviable position on the edge of Port Royal Sound, guests can watch a local fishing fleet (one of only two on the island) unload the day’s loot, which could include anything from white shrimp to soft-shell crab.

Order: From September through April, opt for the steamed local cluster oysters in the shell ($12 for a half bucket); the restaurant farms and harvests them.

1 Hudson Road, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29926; hudsonsonthedocks.com

Bowens Island Restaurant

Should you find yourself in the Holy City, make the worthwhile dirt-road detour to this family-owned restaurant that’s been a rambling fixture along Folly Creek since 1946. With its graffitied walls and worn-in wood floors, it doesn’t beg for attention, and it doesn’t need to. Deemed an American Classic by the James Beard Foundation in 2006, the Lowcountry seafood joint shovels fresh-steamed oysters onto trays September through the first half of May and dishes fried shrimp and hush puppies year-round. It’s all delicious—and it's made even more so if you snag a seat on the waterside deck.

Order: The shrimp (served boiled or fried) and fried fish platter is served with the seafood-dive-side-dish trifecta: french fries, hush puppies, and coleslaw.

1870 Bowens Island Road, Charleston, SC 29412; bowensisland.com

The Crab Shack

Situated on the main drag of the freewheeling beach town just 12 miles from buttoned-up Charleston, The Crab Shack is as family-friendly and flip-flop casual as its surrounds. Start with the the she-crab soup, but save room: The value seafood baskets—which you can order with flounder, shrimp, or scallops (or a combination of all three)—are generously portioned. Catch them at another location in Charleston as well.

Order: The marquee offering, The Charleston Steamed Seafood Bucket, includes two snow crab clusters, large domestic shrimp, and steamed oysters (market price).

26 Center Street, Folly Beach, SC 29439 and 8486 Dorchester Rd, Charleston, SC 29420; crabshacks.com

explore charleston

Leon’s Fine Poultry & Oyster Shop

Housed in a reimagined garage on Upper King Street, the Brooks Reitz-helmed restaurant turned 10 in 2024, but it’s been a neighborhood favorite from the start, thanks to a menu of mouthwatering fried chicken, expectedly fresh oysters, and surprisingly craveable salads. Add to the clever mix soft-serve ice cream and buckets of Miller High Life ponies, and you’ve found yourself one of the best meals in this restaurant-proud town.

Order: Even the bivalve-averse crowd may develop a taste for oysters after sampling Leon's char-grilled take, which swim in a melty swirl of lemon and butter and are topped with a generous sprinkle of parmesan. The "old-school" scalloped potatoes are also not to be missed.

698 King St, Charleston, SC 29403; leonsoystershop.com

The Sea Shack

Don’t let inevitable line out the door during summertime scare you off. This treasured counter-service spot with just 40 seats is an area favorite thanks to its wide array of offerings, from conch fritters to flounder sandwiches. It’s all made to order and to your liking—fried, grilled, or blackened. Wash it down with a glass of what they declare to be the best sweet tea on the island, and finish with a slice of strawberry Key Lime pie (when it’s seasonally available) or a cup of banana pudding.

Order: Hearty appetites should try the Shack Attack Combo ($17.95 for lunch, $19.95 for dinner), which combines a crab cake, fish, shrimp, scallops, and oysters on a giant paper platter. Homemade tartar sauce is the traditional accompaniment, but we think the brandy-infused gator sauce makes an even better platter slather.

6B Executive Park Road, Hilton Head Island, SC 29928; seashackhhi.com

explore hilton head

Sullivan’s Fish Camp

With its lofted ceilings, lacquered-wood booths, and commitment to retro branding, this Sullivan’s Island joint feels like it’s been there forever. In reality, it’s a newcomer—a spring 2022 top-to-bottom overhaul of a restaurant that had called the same spot home for 30 years. And while the nostalgically striped, umbrella-shaded patio is painfully charming, the takeaway window makes a strong case for a to-go lobster roll savored on the beach just a few blocks away.

Order: The shrimp fried rice ($24) puts a fresh coastal twist on a takeout mainstay. We also love the Key lime pie.

2019 Middle Street, Sullivan's Island, SC 29482; sullivansfishcamp.com

explore Sullivan's Island

The Wreck of the Richard and Charlene

So named for the trawler that was tossed ashore on the same spot during Hurricane Hugo in 1989, this dinner-only, no-reservations establishment on Shem Creek shrugs off formalities in favor of its dynamite views and deliciously simple seafood. The best seat in the house belongs to the wooden dockside bar, where sunset views and local craft beers are just an arm’s length away.

Order: Complete with red rice, coleslaw, a hush puppy, and a fried hominy square, the shrimp platter (from $17.95) is a true taste of the Lowcountry. The deviled crab is also worth a try.

106 Haddrell Street, Mount Pleasant, SC 29464; wreckrc.com

Shrimp Shack

This family-owned lunch spot has been an island institution since it first opened its doors in 1978, and its magic belongs to its simplicity. They're only open for lunch, and you order through a carry-out window—though you don't have to take your food home. Snag one of the picnic tables on the porch for an especially satisfying alfresco dining experience.

Order: Given the restaurant's name, it's obvious you can't go wrong with shrimp here, but the shrimp burger ($9.30), served on a bun with tartar sauce and mayo, is a true crowd favorite.

1929 Sea Island Parkway, Saint Helena Island, SC 29920; facebook.com/shrimpshacksc

Mr. Fish Restaurant

There’s something for everyone on the extensive menu at this landmark Grand Strand restaurant and seafood market owned by a fisherman father and his culinary school-trained daughter. Choose a South Carolina classic, like the Lowcountry boil, or make the most of the raw bar and order a sushi roll or two. Stretch mealtime into a full-fledged Mr. Fish experience by reserving a ride to and from dinner in the Mr. Fishmobile, a bright blue school bus that hits all the nostalgic high notes.

Order: The seafood tacos ($15) are made with your choice of mahi, tuna, or shrimp and are topped with chipotle-lime sauce.

6307 North Kings Highway, Suite B, Myrtle Beach, SC 29572; mrfish.com

Explore Myrtle Beach

Charleston is a peninsula surrounded by water, but it isn’t necessarily a beach town, per se. If you’re after the best Charleston beaches, you’ll need to plan ahead to drive to visit one of the sea islands that flank the city. The decision will pay dividends, however, as each beach offers wide views to the horizon, the waters of the Atlantic Ocean, and plenty of space to enjoy both. Most on this list come with a “beach town,” to boot, from Edisto’s sleepy seafood shacks to live bands at the Windjammer as the sun sets on Isle of Palms.

Whatever you’re after, pack some sunscreen and keep these tips in your back pocket for assured fun in the sun: The later in the day you arrive, the more crowded it will be. If you are picky about your place on the sand, then go to Charleston beaches early. The combo of tourists who generally have later starts to the day plus locals who like to knock off work early to get a few hours of beach time equals an increase in traffic and a decrease in towel real estate nearest peak sunshine. Note that each beach has its own rules for parking, from Folly’s “wheels off the road” rule to Isle of Palms’ city operated lots. It’s a delicate dance between livable beach communities and visitor pressure, so respect and patience keep public access palatable for all.

Heads-up: drinking and smoking on most Charleston beaches is a big no no, and can cost you big time. It’s a rule that is consistently enforced, and most locals know someone (or have been someone) who came with beer or other alcoholic beverages in a beach tote and left with a tan and a fine of up to $1000. Also, note that vibes vary from beach to beach. Each one of Charleston’s beach towns has its own culture. While Folly Beach is a free-stylin’ hippie, Edisto is a genteel country cousin, and Isle of Palms a fun-loving student on spring break. This is, of course, a simplification, but can help with deciding which to-the-water trek most fits your interests.

Read on for our complete Charleston city guide, which includes: